STANISLAUS CONNECTIONS

Working For Peace, Justice, and A Sustainable Environment

A Modesto Peace/Life Center Publication

June, 2002

Living Lightly

Irradiated food: wave of the future or menace?

By MYRTLE OSNER

If irradiation with low grade nuclear by-products kills germs, why isn’t it good for us? After all, the technique of irradiation has been used for decades to sterilize medical products, and no one has complained.

A Modesto conference, “Food Irradiation and Agriculture,” was sponsored by Public Citizen (a national organization founded by Ralph Nader), Community Alliance with Family Farmers, and the Sustainable Agriculture Working Group.

Food irradiation has been around since the 1960s but has not been widespread. It was used chiefly during the Vietnam and Korean wars to extend the keeping qualities of food for soldiers. Irradiation at low doses does kill germs so the food doesn’t spoil as fast. Consumer resistance is one of the reasons it hasn’t taken off. In our area, Save Mart used to sell irradiated hamburger patties but stopped because it wasn’t popular with consumers.

Objections to irradiation stem from several sources.

1. Food irradiation changes the chemical content of foods when it kills bacteria. Vitamins A, B1, C and E are destroyed even at low dosages. Fatty acids in foods, under radiation, form chemicals known as 2 DCBs, substances not found naturally anywhere on earth. Most notable of their effects, say the researchers, are that they are growth enhancers for some types of cancers. (They don’t necessarily cause cancer, but make cancer grow faster if it is present already.)

2. Irradiated foods extend the shelf life of foods, and thus may mask contamination, especially in meats. Such contamination is especially prevalent today as factory farms and slaughterhouses, which focus on speed and are not easily monitored, proliferate. Furthermore, the industry, it has been shown, often raises meat in unsanitary conditions. The term “vertical integration” describes the way in which the meat industry is now owned. Enormous corporations start with the animal and process it from birth to your table. The graphic examples of what happens have been well documented on such shows as 60 minutes. (Most people have no idea where their meat comes from; it’s hard to tell when you are in the store, far from the source, when it isn’t even labeled.)

3. By extending shelf life, shippers of food from all over the world compete with our local farmers. In most developing countries, food safety and inspection, use of pesticides and herbicides, and worker safety are non-existent. Cheap labor and danger to workers go hand in hand. This is one of the threats of the “globalization” of our food supply. By undercutting American farmers, our own agriculture is at risk. Irradiation has been touted as a way to kill all the bugs hitching a ride to our country and getting a foothold here, becoming environmental nightmares.

4. A by-product of the nuclear industry, cobalt 60, is used in irradiation. It’s one way to use up these degraded nuclear products, and the industry is anxious to find a use for it. No safety margins have been established and no studies have been done about what happens to humans when they eat irradiated food over time.

5. The irradiation industry is pressing to be able to call irradiation “pasteurization.”This is definitely deceptive. It is not pasteurization, and cannot be equated with pasteurization of milk which has been used safely since the 1920s.

According to Public Citizen, proper labeling should be insisted upon, so that the public will know what they are getting. At this time, the Food and Drug Agency has not required proper labeling. There is a symbol (see sidebar) but the label on the products we were shown was so small you couldn’t read the writing without a magnifying glass.

ACTION: For further information, go to Public Citizen Critical Mass and Environmental Program, www.citizen.org/cmep

Slow Food means enjoying more than food

By MYRTLE OSNER

According to Utne Reader, the Slow Food movement is mushrooming in such chi-chi places as Berkeley, Portland, Oregon, Brussels, and Rome.

Recently, The Modesto Bee published an article touting the Slow Food principles in, of all places, Christopaolo’s in Ripon. Surprise! I don’t think of Ripon as a leader in organic food use, particularly. However, the idea of Slow Food, eaten in comfortable community surroundings, has a definite commercial appeal.

So, what are the principles of the Slow Food movement? And can they apply to anyone?

The answer depends on what you think of the Slow Food movement, now an organized entity with an office in Brussels, from which it lobbies the European Union on agriculture and trade policy. The movement was first organized in the small market town of Bra, in the Italian Alps, at least partly as an answer to globalization and the Fast Food culture of McDonalds and its ilk. Believing in the use of local foods, Slow Food helps preserve and support traditional foods grown in local neighborhoods. It defends the use of specialties such as the fine vegetables of certain localities of France and Italy. At first, the movement was centered around fine wines and endangered handmade cheeses, the making of which was known to only a few older farmers.

Later, in direct response to the opening of a McDonalds in Rome, Slow Food declared that “a firm defense of quiet material pleasure is the only way to oppose the universal folly of Fast Life.” Slow Food’s symbol is the snail.

Slow Food has developed into an environmental political movement as well as a defense of good food. Moreover, it celebrates eating with friends and families as one of the true pleasures of life.

In an accompanying article in Utne Reader (May/June 2002) , Alice Waters says that more and more people understand that we are not just passive “consumers” of food, but “they embrace their roles as creators, knowing that the foods they grow and purchase will create a different future for themselves, their families, generations to come, and the natural world.”

A big supporter of organically grown food, Alice Waters tells us that our choices will affect whether we have a sustainable future instead of a system that destroys human health.

Also part of the principles of Slow Food is the opportunity for families to pass on their values to their children and friends with whom they eat. Kindness, generosity, respect, reverence for life and nature are all implicit in the values we should be instilling in our children. Nowadays, when so many working parents are eating on the run, never sitting down to eat with their children, they miss important opportunities that often only come at the table.

Another Utne Reader article, “Food Fast (Not Fast Food), interested me because I attend a lot of civic meetings and often find myself preparing meals in a hurry. There are stories on different kinds of food that can be prepared quickly, but the one that interested me was from Portland, Oregon, where the classic Japanese take-out food called bento is popular and available. You could do almost any bento dish at home in a very short time. Heard of stir-fry? That’s only one of the techniques to combine vegetables with small amounts of meat or fish to make a nourishing fast food. Grilled meats and sushi are another. Bento is packed in its classic box — you can eat it quickly anywhere.

Start eating healthy food from local gardens. We have the best of all possible worlds right at our doorstep. Any Thursday or Saturday you can buy food grown in the Central Valley at the Farmer’s Market in downtown Modesto. Many other cities have Farmer’s Markets also. More and more, you will find food grown organically. But even if it is not, buy locally, not globally.

“Fresh organic, local produce from local farmers not only improves a meal, it prevents pollution, saves fuel, and boosts your local economy.” — Jay Walljasper, editor of Utne Reader. “Eating is the most intimate relationship we have with the environment. Three times a day, it’s how we can re-create the world. We can shape a different future for our children, for farmworkers, the landscape, wildlife, villages around the world, and genetic diversity.” — Andrew Kimball, of the Center for Food Safety.

“Like it or not, what we eat has consequences for us and for the world. Dinner is not something that magically appears on our plates. In ordering a burger or making a salad, we are inextricably linked to the land, cycles of rain and sunshine, farmers and farm workers, compost or chemicals, processing facilities and truck drivers, co-ops or corporations — to a whole web of ecological and human activity.” — Jay Walljasper. Utne Reader, 1624 Harmon Place, Minneapolis, MN.

For more details on eating, and support for local agriculture, refer to May/June Utne Reader article, “Home Grown,” which portrays three communities which successfully matched their farmers with their eaters, providing locally grown food. They were a part of the Sustainable Agriculture movement: Athens, Ohio, Vancouver, British Columbia, and Belo Horizonte, Brazil. People around the world are engaged in urban agriculture, mainly for their own use. The costs of moving food worldwide are staggering, both monetarily and environmentally . Think of the enormous fuel costs and pollution of moving food from, say, South America to Modesto. And it doesn’t have to be that way. Eat locally.