STANISLAUS CONNECTIONS

Working For Peace, Justice, and A Sustainable Environment

April, 2002

A Modesto Peace/Life Center Publication

Peace

Peace and Nuclear Disarmament — a Call to Action

By U.S. REP DENNIS KUCINICH

“. . . Come my friends, ‘tis not too late to seek a newer world,”

                                                                                    - Alfred Lord Tennyson

If you believe that humanity has a higher destiny, if you believe we can evolve, and become better than we are; if you believe we can overcome the scourge of war and someday fulfill the dream of harmony and peace earth, let us begin the conversation today. Let us exchange our ideas. Let us plan together, act together and create peace together. This is a call for common sense, for peaceful, non-violent citizen action to protect our precious world from widening war and from stumbling into a nuclear catastrophe.

The climate for conflict has intensified, with the struggle between Pakistan and India, the China-Taiwan tug of war, and the increased bloodshed between Israel and the Palestinians. United States’ troop deployments in the Philippines, Yemen, Georgia, Columbia and Indonesia create new possibilities for expanded war. An invasion of Iraq is planned. The recent disclosure that Russia, China, Iraq, Iran, Syria, North Korea, and Libya are considered by the United States as possible targets for nuclear attack catalyzes potential conflicts everywhere.

These crucial political decisions promoting increased military actions, plus a new nuclear first-use policy, are occurring without the consent of the American people, without public debate, without public hearings, without public votes. The President is taking Congress’s approval of responding to the Sept. 11 terrorists as a license to flirt with nuclear war.

“Politics ought to stay out of fighting a war,” the President has been quoted as saying on March 13th 2002. Yet Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution explicitly requires that Congress take responsibility when it comes to declaring war. This President is very popular, according to the polls. But polls are not a substitute for democratic process. Attributing a negative connotation here to politics or dismissing constitutionally mandated congressional oversight belies reality. Spending $400 billion a year for defense is a political decision. Committing troops abroad is a political decision. War is a political decision. When men and women die on the battlefield that is the result of a political decision. The use of nuclear weapons, which can end the lives of millions, is a profound political decision. In a monarchy there need be no political decisions. In a democracy, all decisions are political, in that the derive from the consent of the governed.

In a democracy, budgetary, military and national objectives must be subordinate to the political process. Before we celebrate an imperial presidency, let it be said that the lack of free and open political process, the lack of free and open political debate, and the lack of free and open political dissent can be fatal in a democracy.

We have reached a moment in our country’s history where it is urgent that people everywhere speak out as president of his or her own life, to protect the peace of the nation and world within and without. We should speak out and caution leaders who generate fear through talk of the endless war or the final conflict. We should appeal to our leaders to consider that their own bellicose thoughts, words and deeds are reshaping consciousness and can have an adverse effect on our nation. Because when one person thinks fight! he or she finds a fight. One faction thinks war! and starts a war. One nation thinks nuclear! and approaches the abyss. And what of one nation which thinks peace, and seeks peace?

Neither individuals nor nations exist in a vacuum, which is why we have a serious responsibility for each other in this world. It is also urgent that we find those places of war in our own lives, and begin healing the world through healing ourselves. Each of us is a citizen of a common planet, bound to a common destiny. So connected are we, that each of us has the power to be the eyes of the world, the voice of the world, the conscience of the world, or the end of the world. And as each one of us chooses, so becomes the world.

Each of us is architect of this world. Our thoughts, the concepts. Our words, the designs. Our deeds, the bricks and mortar of our daily lives. Which is why we should always take care to regard the power of our thoughts and words, and the commands they send into action through time and space.

Some of our leaders have been thinking and talking about nuclear war. In the past week there has been much news about a planning document which describes how and when America might wage nuclear war. The Nuclear Posture Review recently released to the media by the government

  1. Assumes that the United States has the right to launch a pre-emptive nuclear strike.

  2. Equates nuclear weapons with conventional weapons.

  3. Attempts to minimize the consequences of the use of nuclear weapons.

  4. Promotes nuclear response to a chemical or biological attack.

Some dismiss this review as routine government planning. But it becomes ominous when taken in the context of a war on terrorism which keeps expanding its boundaries, rhetorically and literally. The President equates the “war on terrorism” with World War II. He expresses a desire to have the nuclear option “on the table.” He unilaterally withdraws from the ABM treaty. He seeks $8.9 billion to fund deployment of a missile shield. He institutes, without congressional knowledge, a shadow government in a bunker outside our nation’s Capitol. He tries to pass off as arms reduction, the storage of, instead of the elimination of, nuclear weapons.

Two generations ago we lived with nuclear nightmares. We feared and hated the Russians who feared and hated us. We feared and hated the “godless, atheistic” communists. In our schools, we dutifully put our head between our legs and practiced duck-and-cover drills. In our nightmares, we saw the long, slow arc of a Soviet missile flash into our very neighborhood. We got down on our knees and prayed for peace. We surveyed, wide eyed, pictures of the destruction of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. We supported the elimination of all nuclear weapons. We knew that if you “nuked” others you “nuked” yourself.

The splitting of the atom for destructive purposes admits a split consciousness, the compartmentalized thinking of Us vs. Them, the dichotomized thinking, which spawns polarity and leads to war. The proposed use of nuclear weapons, pollutes the psyche with the arrogance of infinite power. It creates delusions of domination of matter and space. It is dehumanizing through its calculations of mass casualties. We must overcome doom-thinkers and sayers who invite a world descending, disintegrating into a nuclear disaster. With a world at risk, we must find the bombs in our own lives and disarm them. We must listen to that quiet inner voice which counsels that the survival of all is achieved through the unity of all.

We must overcome our fear of each other, by seeking out the humanity within each of us. The human heart contains every possibility of race, creed, language, religion, and politics. We are one in our commonalities. Must we always fear our differences? We can overcome our fears by not feeding our fears with more war and nuclear confrontations. We must ask our leaders to unify us in courage.

We need to create a new, clear vision of a world as one. A new, clear vision of people working out their differences peacefully. A new, clear vision with the teaching of nonviolence, nonviolent intervention, and mediation. A new, clear vision where people can live in harmony within their families, their communities and within themselves. A new clear vision of peaceful coexistence in a world of tolerance.

At this moment peril we must move away from fear’s paralysis. This is a call to action to replace expanded war with expanded peace. This is a call for action to place the very survival of this planet on the agenda of all people, everywhere. As citizens of a common planet, we have an obligation to ourselves and our posterity. We must demand that our nation and all nations put down the nuclear sword. We must demand that our nation and all nations.

Our nation must

We are in a climate where people expect debate within our two party system to produce policy alternatives. However both major political parties have fallen short. People who ask “Where is the Democratic Party?” and expect to hear debate may be disappointed. When peace is not on the agenda of our political parties or our governments then it must be the work and the duty of each citizen of the world. This is the time to organize for peace. This is the time for new thinking. This is the time to conceive of peace as not simply being the absence of violence, but the active presence of the capacity for a higher evolution of human awareness. This is the time to conceive of peace as respect, trust, and integrity. This is the time to tap the infinite capabilities of humanity to transform consciousness which compels violence at a personal, group, national or international levels. This is the time to develop a new compassion for others and ourselves.

When terrorists threaten our security, we must enforce the law and bring terrorists to justice within our system of constitutional justice, without undermining the very civil liberties which permits our democracy to breathe. Our own instinct for life, which inspires our breath and informs our pulse, excites our capacity to reason. Which is why we must pay attention when we sense a threat to survival.

That is why we must speak out now to protect this nation, all nations, and the entire planet and

It is practical to work for peace. I speak of peace and diplomacy not just for the sake of peace itself. But, for practical reasons, we must work for peace as a means of achieving permanent security. It is similarly practical to work for total nuclear disarmament, particularly when nuclear arms do not even come close to addressing the real security problems which confront our nation, witness the events of September 11, 2001.

We can make war archaic. Skeptics may dismiss the possibility that a nation which spends $400 billion a year for military purposes can somehow convert swords into plowshares. Yet the very founding and the history of this country demonstrates the creative possibilities of America. We are a nation which is known for realizing impossible dreams. Ours is a nation which in its second century abolished slavery, which many at the time considered impossible. Ours is a nation where women won the right to vote, which many at the time considered impossible. Ours is a nation which institutionalized the civil rights movement, which many at the time considered impossible. If we have the courage to claim peace, with the passion, the emotion and the integrity with which we have claimed independence, freedom and, equality we can become that nation which makes non-violence an organizing principle in our society, and in doing so change the world.

That is the purpose of HR 2459. It is a bill to create a Department of Peace. It envisions new structures to help create peace in our homes, in our families, in our schools, in our neighborhoods, in our cities, and in our nation. It aspires to create conditions for peace within and to create conditions for peace worldwide. It considers the conditions which cause people to become the terrorists of the future, issues of poverty, scarcity and exploitation. It is practical to make outer space safe from weapons, so that humanity can continue to pursue a destiny among the stars. HR 3616 seeks to ban weapons in space, to keep the stars a place of dreams, of new possibilities, of transcendence.

We can achieve this practical vision of peace, if we are ready to work for it. People worldwide need to be meet with like-minded people, about peace and nuclear disarmament, now. People worldwide need to gather in peace, now. People worldwide need to march and to pray for peace, now. People worldwide need to be connecting with each other on the web, for peace, now. We are in a new era of electronic democracy, where the world wide web, numerous web sites and bulletin boards enable new organizations, exercising freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of association, to spring into being instantly. www.Thespiritoffreedom.com is such a web site. It is dedicated to becoming an electronic forum for peace, for sustainability, for renewal and for revitalization. It is a forum which strives for the restoration of a sense of community through the empowerment of self, through commitment of self to the lives of others, to the life of the community, to the life of the nation, to the life of the world.

Where war making is profoundly uncreative in its destruction, peacemaking can be deeply creative. We need to communicate with each other the ways in which we work in our communities to make this a more peaceful world. I welcome your ideas at http://www.kucinich.us/contact.htm or at www.thespiritoffreedom.com.

We can share our thoughts and discuss ways in which we have brought or will bring them into action.

Now is the time to think, to take action and use our talents and abilities to create peace

Now is the time to think, speak, write, organize and take action to create peace as a social imperative, as an economic imperative, and as a political imperative. Now is the time to think, speak, write, organize, march, rally, hold vigils and take other nonviolent action to create peace in our cities, in our nation and in the world. And as the hymn says, “Let there be peace on earth and let it begin with me.”

This is the work of the human family, of people all over the world demanding that governments and non-governmental actors alike put down their nuclear weapons. This is the work of the human family, responding in this moment of crisis to protect our nation, this planet and all life within it. We can achieve both nuclear disarmament and peace. As we understand that all people of the world are interconnected, we can achieve both nuclear disarmament and peace. We can accomplish this through upholding an holistic vision where the claims of all living beings to the right of survival are recognized. We can achieve both nuclear disarmament and peace through being a living testament to a Human Rights Covenant where each person on this planet is entitled to a life where he or she may consciously evolve in mind, body and spirit.

Nuclear disarmament and peace are the signposts toward the uplifting path of an even brighter human condition wherein we can through our conscious efforts evolve and reestablish the context of our existence from peril to peace, from revolution to evolution. Think peace. Speak peace. Act peace.

Peace.

A conversation in Ramallah
By JEFF GUNTZEL

Human rights activist  Kathy Kelly of Voices in the Wilderness  recently returned to the Middle East along with Jeff Guntzel and three Catholic Worker companions. Each felt very compelled by the extraordinary witness of Palestinians, Israelis and internationals who, at considerable risk, have nonviolently resisted the Occupation, invasion, and acts of random violence that afflict people in Israel and Palestine. Kelly spoken in Modesto in 2000 and 2001.

April 10, 2002

We left for Ramallah yesterday morning. In order to enter the city, our little group had to avoid the Israeli checkpoint by walking (and sometimes running) through the brush just south of the checkpoint. Once we were safely inside the military zone, a taxi driver with whom we had made advance arrangements drove us about a mile into Ramallah and stopped. He would not go any further for fear of Israeli snipers who were situated in many of the city’s tall buildings. A Red Crescent ambulance driver offered to take us to the Sheik Zayed hospital where we had arranged to meet two organizers with the International Solidarity Movement.

Those of you who have been following the news carefully might remember the Sheik Zayed hospital as the site of a mass grave dug, several days earlier, in the parking lot as a temporary burial ground for 29 Palestinians, including one American citizen. The morgue at the hospital was full, and there was nowhere else to put the bodies.

Coming down a steep hill about three miles from the hospital, we spotted a tank and an armored personnel carrier (APC). These days, in Ramallah, the only vehicles on the streets are tanks, APCs, and ambulances (I guess you could also count the mangled cars peppering the roadside that tanks had rolled over during the invasion).

Suddenly a soldier appeared. He crouched on one knee, aimed his M-16 directly at us, and fixed his eye to his gun’s sight. We stopped. The driver began slowly backing up the hill and several more soldiers appeared some of them taking aim and some motioning us to come closer. We all held our passports up to let them know there were internationals in the car. Israeli troops had been harassing, arresting, and even shooting ambulance drivers since the start of the invasion. We had no idea what to expect.

When we got to the soldiers at the bottom of the hill we stopped again. Eight M-16s and a tank were aimed at us. The soldier directly to my right looked tired and scared. That scared me. Our driver was ordered out of the car and asked a few questions in Arabic. Then we were ordered out, with all of our bags. We laid our bags out on the ground and opened them. After a not-so-thorough search several soldiers asked us a few questions while others encircled us. The soldier who at first struck me as tired and scared now just looked cautiously curious.

“Why are you here?” he asked, not quite meeting our eyes.

“We came to bring medicine and food to people under curfew,” said one member of our group.

“Don’t you know there are terrorists here, it is dangerous,” he replied, “do you think you can bring peace?”

“We don’t know,” we said, almost in unison.

Then Kathy, my roommate and co-worker, stepped in, “We are here because we know that our government pays for much of what is going on here and we feel a responsibility to intervene nonviolently in this terrible situation.”

“We did not ask for this, it is the Palestinian leadership, bad leaders, they are responsible for this,” replied the soldier.

“But over half of the people here are children,” Kathy said, “and children can’t be bad leaders, they can only be children!”

“I know there are children here,” he replied solemnly, looking off into the distance, “but there are also terrorists. You cannot drive to the hospital,” said the soldier.

“Then we will walk,” replied Greg, another member of our group, who then began walking towards the tank and APC that partially blocked our path.

“Stop! You cannot walk either,” demanded the soldier, who then paused and looked around. Directly in front of us was a soldier on one knee, holding each of us briefly in his cross-hairs, one person at a time.

“Don’t you understand that you make the terrorists happy when you come here to help them?” the soldier continued.

“We are here to help the innocent people in Ramallah who are being terrorized and killed every day,” replied Kathy.

“We do not kill innocent people.”

“We read Ha’aretz [an Israeli paper, printed in Hebrew and English] every day and we know innocent people are being killed,” Kathy said.

“Do you think I like this?” the soldier demanded, “I don’t want to be here.”

At that moment there was an enormous explosion and sustained machine gun fire. It was coming from directly behind us, and it was really loud. Two members of our group stepped away to smoke, and the others drifted back towards the ambulance. Kathy and I remained with the soldier.

“Do you know what Arafat wants, he wants murder, why do you want to help a murderer,” he asked.

“Maybe there is another way to look at our presence here,” I replied, “We are here operating beneath the level of the leaders who we believe do not want real peace. I think you and I have more in common than you have with Sharon, or than I have with Arafat, wouldn’t you agree?”

“Yes, I agree.”

“So let us go to the hospital,” Kathy responded.

Silence. Then the soldier spoke again, “You know, it is not just the Palestinians who are suffering.”

“We want a just peace for both sides,” we responded, “We want an end to *all* of the violence.”

“It is too late,” insisted the soldier, “there can be no peace now.”

“It is difficult to see a way out, but...”

“Why don’t you work on behalf of the Jews, why can’t you be objective?”

At that moment, another soldier came up to us and began speaking in Hebrew. Then, suddenly, we were told we could get back into the ambulance and push ahead towards the hospital.

The hospital is actually two buildings separated by a road. It was in that road, just yards from the hospital, that an elderly woman with a walker was shot dead by an Israeli sniper just weeks ago. In the parking lot we saw the mass grave we had all read about. It was empty; the killing was less frequent 11 days into the siege, giving hospital workers the window they needed to dispose of the bodies properly.

--Edited by Jim Costello from  a letter sent from Melissa Muro, Voices in the Wilderness, 1-773-784-8065; http://www.nonviolence.org/vitw

Four Reasons not to spend $240 billion on “missile defense”

Excerpted from California Peace Action

1. Missile Defense violates two major international treaties. The Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty, ratified in 1972 by the U.S. Senate. It was negotiated because American President Richard Nixon and General Secretary Leonid Brezhnev recognized that missile defense would lead to an escalation in the nuclear arms race as each side developed ways to overwhelm the other’s shield.

French President Jacques Chirac said in 1999, “If you look at world history, ever since man began waging war, you will see that there is a permanent race between the sword and the shield. The sword always wins...”

Missile defense also violates the 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation (NNP) Treaty in which 171 non-nuclear countries pledged to refrain from developing nuclear weapons in exchange for a commitment from the nuclear powers to disarm. In a 1995 review, the United States, Russia, China, France and Britain formally committed themselves to “preserving and strengthening the NNP treaty.

2. The CIA warns that Missile Defense will launch a new arms race with China and Russia. Deployment of Missile Defense will trigger an unsettling series of political and military ripple effect that would include a sharp build-up of strategic and medium-range nuclear missiles by China, India, Pakistan and the further spread of military technology in the Middle East.

3. Leading scientists say Missile Defense won’t work. Fifty Nobel Prize-winning scientists have stated that deploying Missile Defense would do “grave harm” to US security interests. The tests that have been conducted fall far short of those required to provide confidence in the technical feasibility” called for. The Union of Concerned Scientists “strongly opposes deployment of the proposed Missile Defense.” Testing methods being used do not reflect realistic operational conditions.

4. The FBI is investigating the Missile Defense program for fraud. In June 2000, fifty-three members of Congress demanded “an investigation into the serious allegations of fraud and cover-up in the NMD program.” Many of the biggest proponents of Missile Defense have received enormous contributions from the weapons industry. Arms contractors spent more than $14 million lobbying Congress last year. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld is on the board of the Center for Security Policy, a leading pro-Star-Wars think tank heavily funded by arms manufacturers.

We must choose a new path

Since 1945, we have allowed our government to spend more than $5 trillion on nuclear weapons thinking they would make us safe. Nuclear weapons will never make us safe. Neither will missile defense. The Bush administration plans to spend $240 million on Missile Defense system that will not work.

We need to address the real threats to our survival: global warming, the unjust gap between the rich and the poor, and the increasingly destabilizing arms race.

ACTION:  See calendar, page 12, for confernce in Berkeley on May 11. For more information, contact  California Peace Action, 2800 Adeline St., Suite A., Berkeley, CA 94703. AbolishNukes@CaliforniaPeaceAction.org

--Excerpted by Myrtle Osner

Growing Corn

James Bender, in his book, How to Talk Well (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1994) relates the story of a farmer who grew award-winning corn.

Each year he entered his corn in the state fair where it won a blue ribbon. One year a newspaper reporter interviewed him and learned something interesting about how he grew it. The reporter discovered that the farmer shared his seed corn with his neighbors.

"How can you afford to share your best seed corn with your neighbors when they are entering corn in competition with yours each year?" the reporter asked.

"Why sir," said the farmer, "didn't you know? The wind picks up pollen from the ripening corn and swirls it from field to field. If my neighbors grow inferior corn, cross-pollination will steadily degrade the quality of my corn. If I am to grow good corn, I must help my neighbors grow good corn."

Those who choose to be at peace must help their neighbors to be at peace. Those who choose to live well must help others to live well, for the value of a life is measured by the lives it touches. And those who choose to be happy must help others to find happiness, for the welfare of each is bound up with the welfare of all.

Voices for Peace 

The past few weeks have seen demonstrations and vigils calling end the Israeli occupation of Palestine and for Peace in the Middle East on the streets of Modesto (see page 1). Local activists have also attended the Rally for the Valley for Peace and Justice in Fresno and the April 20th demonstration against war in San Francisco. Josh Pollock, Modesto Peace/Life Center board member, facilitated a film program "Life Under Occupation" at Modesto Junior College. The center also participated in the César Chávez Community Celebration and Modesto's Earth Day. See the calendar, page 12, for upcoming events. To receive email announcements and alerts, contact the Modesto Peace/Life Center at 529-5750 or mplc@ainet.com

Helping in the Middle East

Ecumenical Accompaniment Programme in Palestine (through the World Council of Churches) Although no dates are available at this time, email Mark Brown at Marsusab@aol.com.

The Christian Peacemaker Team (CPT) in Hebron CPT is looking for an emergency delegation immediately for the Hebron District, and possibly in other areas. Participants should have prior training/experience in nonviolence work and a strong faith grounding. There will be a one day training on site. Cost US$1800. Contact: CPT website at www.cpt.org

Interfaith Peace-Builders Delegation: An Interfaith delegation, sponsored by the Fellowship of Reconciliation and co-sponsored by the Muslim Peace Fellowship and the Jewish Peace Fellowship. Check their website for future trips at www.forusa.org or email for@forusa.org

Reality Tours Program: California's Global Exchange sponsors tours to many countries to expose U.S. people to what is happening. They have upcoming tours to Israel/Palestine for August and December 2002. Visit www.globalexchange.org or email infor@globalexchange.org

Freedom Summer in Palestine, 2002: Teams will be posted in various regions and hosted by Palestinians. Participate in nonviolent activities along with local community leadership. Call the Canadian Arab Federation at 416-493-8635 for more information.

The International Solidarity Movement (ISM) and the Grass-Roots International Protection for the Palestinian People (GIPP): Attempts to get the International activists from Jerusalem into one of the Palestinian cities in order to help with the activism there. The guest house of the YWCA will be base of operation. The cost is $15 per person per night on bed and breakfast basis. As for other kind of costs, it will be hard to estimate.

Guest House info: Young Women Christian Association - Jerusalem (YWCA ) Abla Naser, Ibn Jubeir St., East Jerusalem Tel: 02- 628 2593; Fax: 02- 628 4654

Please contact the following addresses pcr@p-ol.com and a copy (CC) to georgesq@yahoo.com and include the following heading in the subject line "Register May". We will arrange the accommodation and transportation if needed.

Tasks Needed in Palestine: 1- Provide Protection for civilians by staying with Families in Refugees camps, villages and towns. 2- There is a great need for Internationals to act as medic teams in Palestinian ambulances. 3- Send food and aid to families if needed 4- Join Nonviolent Protests if organized 5- Help document the facts, either through cameras or video or writing diaries to be published through e-mail and internet.

International Women's Peace Service: Women need to be a minimum of 21 years of age and willing to work and live in a group where decision making is by consensus. They need some skills in human rights monitoring or accompaniment and have previous experience in nonviolent direct action. Major costs are met by the project itself. Contact Nadya Waziri Email: solush@usa.net

 --Submitted by Tom Hampson

Dilemmas of a peacemaker
By GERSHON BASKIN, Ph.D.

Even before the latest Israeli invasion of the Palestinian territories following the Passover suicide bombing in Netanyah two weeks ago, the work of peacemaking between Israelis and Palestinians has been a Sisyphus type task. The frustrations far outweigh the feelings of success and everyday is a new struggle to find hope to feed the motivation to continue. Many articles have been written over the past 19 months in newspapers around the world about those of us who have continued to work for peace in Israel and Palestine. Always these articles contain the question: Can they continue? (or How can they continue?).

After a brief holiday abroad for Passover I came back to face the staff of the Israel/Palestine Center for Research and Information( IPCRI), our colleagues and friends, many of them living under curfew, in the midst of a brutal war, their families and themselves under risks of imprisonment or even more violent fates. I too followed the news by the hour from thousands of miles away, checking my email and the internet at least four times a day, being glued to the 24 hours a day news programs on American television. One morning I woke at 7:00 am to put a video movie on the television for one of my children. The TV was set to CNN. In the background I saw a picture from Israeli television - it was my supermarket, 100 meters from my home that had been bombed. It seemed that each morning we were greeted by more and more bad and worsening news from home. I spent additional hours each day phoning friends and colleagues in the West Bank to find out how they were. Many friends and family members suggested to my wife and to my children that maybe we should stay in America for a while - a year or two or more. No one apparently had the courage to offer me the same advice. I felt too far away and I was anxious to come home.

But coming home isn't easy. What should we do now? How can we be effective to change this awful reality. I spoke with some Palestinian leaders and asked them for advice - how can we help, what difference can we make. One senior Palestinian official told me that the most important thing to do is to find the way to get the Palestinian medical services functioning once again. People are dying because of lack of functioning hospitals, doctors are under curfew, ambulances are shot at, supplies are finished, blood is running out, no electricity, no water, etc. Thinking that perhaps the Israeli Minister of Health, MK Nissim Dahan from Shas, might be willing to raise his voice, I phoned another MK from Shas, a Deputy Minister who had been involved in some of IPCRI's back-channel talks in the past. In the past, MK Yitzhak Cohen had even come to IPCRI's office in Bethlehem to meet Marwan Barghouthi and other senior Tanzim officials. I thought that if I use the Jewish term "pikuah nefesh" - for the sake of human lives, I might be able to convince him to speak with his fellow Shas MK, Minister of Health Dahan. I called Yitzhak at home on this past Friday morning. I was told by him that the only "pikuh nefesh" that he was concerned with were of Jewish origin. He said to me "Do you want an IDF soldier to be killed by a terrorist hiding in an ambulance?". As ambulances have already been used for the purpose of transporting terrorists, I had little to say to him. I suggested that they should at least let the doctors get to the hospitals and allow medicine to enter the Palestinian territories. My requests fell on deaf ears. He told me to speak to the army. Knowing that it was a ridiculous notion, but for the sake of "pikuh nefesh", I did call the IDF, but they too seemed less than interested in helping.

Yesterday, in our IPCRI staff meeting with those who could come to our office, located on the border between Jerusalem and Bethlehem, we tried to figure out what we should/could be doing now. We can hear the shooting in Bethlehem just one hundred meters away. The tanks are moving in and out along the road adjacent to the entrance to our place. We have two members of our staff under siege in Bethlehem, one in a refugee camp, visible from our office, and another one further inside the city - her house had been in the middle of the fighting the night before and seven bullets penetrating their windows into their salon. We began the meeting by having each person express what they felt and thought about their own personal situation and experiences and their more general view of the situation. Most people spoke about being attacked by friends and family for continuing to work with people from the other side and continuing to believe in peace with them. Everyone also spoke with an overwhelming sense of pessimism and despair, all of them looking at me with the hope that I would provide the message of hope and a bit of optimism. Not an easy task these days.

I said that perhaps the most important thing that we could/should do during these days is to keep our own personal contacts and lines of communication open and encourage all of our colleagues and friends to do the same. Our message must be one of solidarity with those people on both sides who still want peace. We know that there are still people on both sides who believe in peace. We must try to provide humanitarian aid wherever and however possible. Yesterday I helped a shipment of donated food supplies to get to a refugee camp. These small elements of help can provide some small relief from the suffering. We must also continue to help in the development of public policy options particularly at this time when public thinking has become so one dimensional. Our ability to communicate with people in positions of leadership and power on both sides is perhaps unique and essential, maybe even more than ever right now.

I believe that the possibility of a bi-lateral Israeli-Palestinian solution is further away than ever and therefore we must turn to the international community to help. We need imposed solutions that require the United States to play a much more responsible leadership role. There are initial signs that this is beginning to happen, but it must not be too little because it is already too late. Civil society, locally, in Israel and in Palestine, and internationally must become much more aggressive and determined in making demands to end the conflict first by ending the siege of Palestine and getting the Palestinian leadership to retake control of its territory and its people. Terrorism must end, but Israel must understand that the root reasons for the terrorism must be addressed and not only the symptoms. The occupation must end and if the leaders and people of Israel are incapable of seeing that just now because of the threats that they face, the international community, at the political level and at the civil society level must drive that point home in determined and in unambiguous language. The days of constructive ambiguity are far behind us.

The people of Israel and the Government of Israel must understand that they are waging a war that cannot be won. The occupation will end and an independent State of Palestine will be established. The current destruction of the basis for future understanding between Israelis and Palestinians can and must be repaired by individual Israelis and Palestinians together. We must overcome the hatred, the anger, the fear and the despair. That is the true task of peacemakers today. At a time when our leaders have stopped thinking about tomorrow, me must provide the tomorrow. We must create the hope through our expression of human concern for each other's welfare. We must demand that our relations be humanized when all around us tells us to dehumanize the other.

When my Palestinian friends are under siege, when they have no water, no food, are living under curfew and risk being killed, my expression of outrage is a message of my humanity and my belief that this is not being done in my name. When many Palestinians call me to express their outrage after a suicide bombing in Israel, I too know that this was not done in their name and their expression of outrage is a witness to their humanity. I will not accept that there are no partners on the other side. I know that there are many as I know that there are many in Israel.

We in IPCRI have decided that we are not canceling any of our work plans. We may have to delay them for reasons beyond our control. We will not accept "no" as an answer from people who yesterday were willing to meet and talk and today have changed their mind. We will continue to provide the venue and the means for people to meet and talk and plan together a better future. We will continue to oppose the use of violence and force as a means of conflict resolution - this resolves no conflicts and can solve no problems.

We all live in great fear today. We all have no real idea what is in store for us each and every day. We have to remain firmly committed to our principles and to our visions. And if reality doesn't fit our vision right now, we must not accept the new reality, we must reject it and we must change it. When I first became politically involved in this conflict some 27 years and I supported the two-State solution - the creation of an independent State of Palestine alongside of Israel in the 1967 borders, I was called a traitor and a self-hating Jew. There may still be those who continue to say that, but I know that the majority of the people of Israel still recognize that is what will emerge, if only we are wise enough to accept it. People might think that we are crazy and naive. I believe that I am neither. The positions that we represent and stand by are the only sane and the most un-naive positions possible. When the entire area has gone insane, remaining sane can sometimes seem like insanity, but there is a clear and coherent difference. Recognizing that difference is the first step in reclaiming our roles as peacemakers.

-- Edited by Jim Costello and reprinted with permission

From Ha'aretz, English edition: Jerusalem, April 14 -Sharon has proved that apart from deploying military force, he is unskilled when it comes to delving into the arsenal of other measures which he has at his disposal (such instruments include, for instance, diplomacy, and media or public relations). The problem is that Arafat continually furnishes Sharon pretexts for relying on his chosen method - the Palestinian leader's penchant for giving Sharon excuses befuddles even the most steadfast dove.

- From editorial by Uzi Benziman

Alternative to Sharon's Policies Jerusalem, April 18 -After an entire year in which Sharon was given the opportunity to present an executable political plan alongside the use of military force against terrorism, he has failed to do so. (The Israeli) Labour (Party) must present a clean alternative to Sharon's policies,which seek to maintain Israel's grip on the territories, and must challenge those policies in the Knesset and public forms. The alternative must be a vision of a country that wants to live in security inside the 2967 border, and trtain its character as a Jewish and democratic stated.

--Excerpted by Indira Clark

International questions & answers 
By MICHAEL NAPP

Question: Which country alone in the Middle East has nuclear weapons? Answer: Israel.

Q: Which country in the Middle East refuses to sign the nuclear non- proliferation treaty and bars international inspections?
A: Israel.

Q: Which country in the Middle East seized the sovereign territory of other nations by military force and continues to occupy it in defiance of United Nations Security Council resolutions?
A: Israel.

Q: Which country in the Middle East routinely violates the international borders of another sovereign state with warplanes and artillery and naval gunfire?
A: Israel.

Q: What American ally in the Middle East has for years sent assassins into other countries to kill its political enemies (a practice sometimes called exporting terrorism)?
A: Israel.

Q: In which country in the Middle East have high-ranking military officers admitted publicly that unarmed prisoners of war were executed?
A: Israel.

Q: What country in the Middle East refuses to prosecute its soldiers who have acknowledged executing prisoners of war?
A: Israel.

Q: What country in the Middle East created 762,000 refugees and refuses to allow them to return to their homes, farms and businesses?
A: Israel.

Q: What country in the Middle East refuses to pay compensation to people whose land, bank accounts and businesses it confiscated?
A: Israel.

Q: In what country in the Middle East was a high-ranking United Nations diplomat assassinated?
A: Israel.

Q: In what country in the Middle East did the man who ordered the assassination of a high-ranking U.N. diplomat become prime minister?
A: Israel.

Q: What country in the Middle East blew up an American diplomatic facility in Egypt and attacked a U.S. ship in international waters, killing 33 and wounding 177 American sailors?
A: Israel.

Q: What country in the Middle East employed a spy, Jonathan Pollard, to steal classified documents and then gave some of them to the Soviet Union?
A: Israel.

Q: What country at first denied any official connection to Pollard, then voted to make him a citizen and has continuously demanded that the American president grant Pollard a full pardon?
A: Israel.

Q: What country on Planet Earth has the second most powerful lobby in the United States, according to a recent Fortune magazine survey of Washington insiders?
A: Israel.

Q: Which country in the Middle East is in defiance of 69 United Nations Security Council resolutions and has been protected from 29 more by U.S. vetoes?
A: Israel.

Q: What country is the United States threatening to bomb because "U.N. Security Council resolutions must be obeyed?"
A: Iraq