STANISLAUS CONNECTIONS

Working For Peace, Justice, and A Sustainable Environment

September, 2001

A Modesto Peace/Life Center Publication

Middle East Peace and Justice

In the debate on Middle East, both sides worthy of criticism

By JERRY LONG

When debating what level of support the United States should give to the state of Israel, the “self-hating Jew” may have a range of options. The self-thinking Gentile, unfortunately, is allowed only two: Love it or fund it. We must accept the arrogant defiance of the Israeli statesman bluntly telling us to stay out of his country’s internal affairs as he strolls up to Capitol Hill to pocket billions of our tax dollars. Above all, we must never suggest that Palestinians have as much right to their own independent state as the Israelis do, lest we be portrayed as modern-day Kristallnacht enablers.

Personally, I have never considered the phrase 'God gave this to us' an acceptable policy position, as though some Ancient Omnipotent Landlord mistakenly drew up a lease agreement with a 3,000-year sublet option.

Yes, the Palestinians refused to compromise in 1947, but if the Lenape showed up today with a 300-year-old claim to the Delaware Valley, I doubt we’d be packing up and partitioning.

Yes, there have been Jews on the land for millennia, but there have also been Palestinians. And before either, there were Canaanites and Philistines amid the milk and honey. The Jews dealt with these peoples the old-fashioned way: They smote some, co-opted others, and constantly made bloody war among themselves. In fact (on the off-chance that facts matter to the discussion), the entire period of a “Greater Israel,” the basis for the current settlement controversy, lasted no more than 80 years and ended around 920 B.C.

Some Jewish groups are properly unceasing in their efforts to teach the world the lessons of the Holocaust. But when a country institutes a policy of preemptive assassination, it may be about time to ask what lessons Israel has learned, and from which side it learned them.

While Israeli government rationales have never been strangers to hypocrisy, shouldn’t someone at least mention that if the British had pursued a strategy of assassinating militants deemed to be threats to security, Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir would have been killed in the 1940s and Count Folke Bernadotte, the man appointed U.N. mediator in Palestine in 1948 (and promptly assassinated), would have spent the 1950s in a suite at the King David Hotel?

So Yasir Arafat is a terrorist - but should Israelis then feel superior because their current prime minister is merely a war criminal? Granted, Arafat must exert greater control over his murderers - but couldn’t Sharon have trundled down from his perch above Sabra and Shatilla to stop Christian Phalangists from bashing the heads of Palestinian children against stone walls? OK, Yasir Arafat is a corrupt fraud - but should the United States really be in the business of denying a people their rights based on the inadequacies of their leader?

Please spare me the hackneyed analogies about how Americans would feel if subjected to terrorist bombings from Canada. Last time I checked, we weren’t surrounding Montreal with troops. We weren’t diverting the water supply of Edmonton, bulldozing homes on the outskirts of Toronto, or erecting roadblocks and checkpoints throughout Quebec.

Perhaps there can never be peace in the Middle East as long as Arafat is alive. But there will also never be peace until the Holocaust is seen for what it was: a rancid and unspeakably obscene chapter in a 20th-century book of depravity that includes Armenians, Cambodians, Rwandans and Kulaks - and not an Accountability E-ZPass for a government to view its policies as somehow beyond criticism. Meanwhile, the United States continues to deplore all violence while pursuing policies that indulge the lunacy of the settlers and fuel the lunacy of Hamas. Our government can never be an honest broker of Arab hopes until it finds the political courage to cease being a willing executor of Israeli demands.

These are the only absolute truths about the Middle East: Barbarity and goodness exist on both sides while innocent children are dying.

JerryBeggar@aol.com, Philadelphia Inquirer Aug 17, 2001, (c) Philadelphia Inquirer

The following is the text for a full-page ad to appear in the New York Times. Jewish Voices Against the Occupation is soliciting signatures nationwide for this ad.

JEWISH VOICES AGAINST ISRAEL’S OCCUPATION OF PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES

We believe that there can be peace between Israelis and Palestinians, a truly just resolution to their conflict. But there can be no peace or security for Israelis or Palestinians until Israel completely evacuates its settlements in Palestinian territories, ends its military occupation, and returns to its pre-1967 borders.

We are outraged and saddened by Israel’s brutal occupation of Palestinian lands and its suppression of Palestinians’ right to sovereign statehood, guaranteed under Articles 1 and 55 of the Charter of the United Nations. These lands, the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem, were taken by force of arms in 1967, and have been held ever since in violation of international law and numerous U.N. Security Council and General Assembly resolutions.

In taking the above positions, we support many in the Israeli peace movement, including Bat Shalom, Coalition of Women for a Just Peace, Committee Against House Demolitions, Gush Shalom, New Profile, Physicians for Human Rights, Rabbis for Human Rights, and Ta’ayush.

As Jews, we call upon the Israeli government to take the following steps:

Israel must agree to the immediate establishment of an international peacekeeping force in the occupied territories to protect civilians from violence by the Israeli military and settlers. In particular, the following actions violate the Fourth Geneva Convention:

Israel receives approximately $3 billion each year in U.S. aid. According to the U.S. Arms Export Control Act, the military portion can be used only for “legitimate self-defense” and “internal security.” In addition, the Leahy law prohibits U.S. assistance to foreign military units that violate human rights. Israel’s use of U.S. military aid to purchase U.S.-made weapons such as helicopter gunships and fighter jets, with which it has attacked civilian populations, clearly violates U.S. law.

Therefore, as Jews and U.S. taxpayers, we call upon the U.S. Government to:

  1. suspend military aid to Israel until it withdraws completely from occupied territories, and

  2. reduce economic aid by the amount Israel spends on maintaining the settlements until all the settlements are evacuated. These funds should be used to reconstruct the devastated infrastructure of Palestine.

Finally, we urge the Israeli Government to acknowledge that it bears significant historical responsibility for the dispossession of the Palestinian people, and to join in the effort to find a just solution to the plight of Palestinian refugees.

We also call upon the Palestinian Authority to make every effort to curtail acts of terrorism against Israeli civilians.

Israel’s security policies harm all the peoples of the Middle East and make Israel less safe, not more.

From September 29, 2000 (beginning of the second Intifada) until July 5, 2001

Why No Palestinian Could Accept Barak’s “Generous Offers”

At the Taba talks in January 2001, Barak made more generous offers, but political developments in Israel made it impossible to proceed with these proposals.

(End of ad text)

Since this ad will be paid for by the signatories, we are asking a minimum contribution of $36 per signer, but urge you to contribute as much as you can. While this ad represents Jewish voices, we welcome contributions from others who support this project.

All monies received beyond the cost of the ad will be used to publish a similar ad in Israeli and other U.S. newspapers.

You may sign this ad at http://www.jvao.org/ , but you should send your contribution by check to: Jewish Voices Against the Occupation, P.O. Box 11606, Berkeley, CA 94712.

Activists condemn US policy on Iraq: fast continues

Grassroots activists in the National Network to End the War Against Iraq are condemning the most recent U.S. bombings of Iraq and encouraging people to support efforts to lift the deadly sanctions on Iraq. U.S. officials say the Aug. 10 attack by 50 American and British aircraft on Iraqi military sites was part of the maintenance of the “no-fly zones” in Iraq, implying the strikes were defensive. But the no-fly zones have not been authorized by any U.N. Security Council resolution, and the U.S./U.K. military action is blatantly illegal. U.S. references to “coalition forces” are meant to obscure the fact that except for the British, the United States has no support for these actions.

Activists in the Network — along with most governments around the world and scores of human-rights groups — argue that the real threat in Iraq is the continuation of sanctions that have been imposed for 11 years. U.N. studies indicate more than 1 million Iraqi civilians have died as a direct result of the sanctions. Most of the nations of the world want the embargo lifted so that the Iraqi economy can be rebuilt, but the United States has used its power to keep them in place.

While the United States continues to pursue aggressive and illegal actions against Iraq, members of the U.S. peace group Voices in the Wilderness continue their fast to bring attention to the humanitarian crisis in Iraq. The “Breaking Ranks: A Fast to End the Siege of Iraq” action across the street from the U.N. building in New York began Aug. 6 and will continue through Sept. 14.

In early September, Voices members and local activists across the United States will organize “Life Under Siege” tent encampments to depict living conditions forced upon Iraqis by the sanctions. For information, go to http://www.nonviolence.org/vitw/pages/145.htm. The National Network to End the War Against Iraq was formed after a national conference in Denver that brought together activists from peace-and-justice, faith-based and student groups working to end the U.S. military and economic attack on Iraq. For information, visit www.endthewar.org.

Breaking ranks: a fast to end the siege against Iraq

from Voices in the Wilderness Fast Group

On Day 10 of the fast, (Wednesday, August 15), nine participants along with three supporters were arrested for bringing a meal of cooked lentils and rice to the steps of the US Mission to the UN. We invited staff members to share the meal and engage in dialogue about how sanctions affect Iraqi civilians. The NYPD jailed us for 8 - 10 hours of “processing.” On September 20 we’ll be tried for criminal trespass and obstruction. The head of security for the US Mission to the UN stated several times that we have no right to be on the steps of the US Mission because we have no official business to conduct inside. Rev. Daniel Berrigan, SJ clarified that we have very important business to conduct, that we had come to talk about the death of 5,000 children under age five who, according to UNICEF, die each month as a direct result of the economic sanctions against Iraq.

Those arrested included Rev. Dan Berrigan, SJ New York, NY, Rev. Simon Harak, SJ New York, NY, and Dr. Earl Crow, Winston-Salem NC. Others also arrested are Cynthia Banas, Ceylon Mooney, Melissa Muro, Kathy Kelly, Mark Paye, Lori Blanding, Johannes Limberger, Rev. Jerry Zawada, OFM, and Joan Gregory.

Our August 13, 2001 letter of invitation to the US Mission to the UN, said: “We again invite you to partake with us in a simple meal of cooked lentils and rice, symbolic of daily fare available to many Iraqi civilians as a consequence of economic sanctions. We will also have with us untreated water from the East River. We don’t want to serve or drink it, but rather remind ourselves of how vulnerable Iraqi civilians are to water borne diseases. Many of us have traveled to Iraq and, like you, we have tried to keep ourselves apprised of developments as they affect ordinary Iraqi people. We have followed the proposals of the UK and the US as regards smart sanctions very carefully, yet the UK proposal in its final form still did not convince us that the so called smart sanctions would alleviate the suffering endured by innocent Iraqi civilians. We look forward to an opportunity to talk with any members of your staff who are willing to gather with us.”

In a press statement, the fasters noted that Condaleeza Rice assured the world that the US has Iraq on its radar screen.

Our response to her statement: “We’d like to see the vulnerable Iraqis, particularly children, who continue to suffer under sanctions and bombardment, appear on the screen.”

In 1999, UNICEF estimated that the sanctions had already cost the lives of 500,000 Iraqi children under the age of five.

We were pleased to celebrate, in jail, two anniversaries: Dan Berrigan professed his vows as a Jesuit priest 62 years ago and Jerry Zawada took vows as a Franciscan priest 42 years ago.

ACTION: Visit our website, http://www.nonviolence.org/vitw, for updates, photos, reflections from our delegation just returned from Iraq and descriptions of “life under siege” encampments planned for September 1 - 14. Voices in the Wilderness, 1-773-784-8065, 1460 West Carmen Ave, Chicago 60640.