STANISLAUS CONNECTIONS
Working For Peace, Justice, and A Sustainable Environment
September, 2001
A Modesto Peace/Life Center Publication
Middle East Peace and Justice
In
the debate on Middle East, both sides worthy of criticism
By
JERRY LONG
When debating what level of
support the United States should give to the state of Israel, the “self-hating
Jew” may have a range of options. The self-thinking Gentile, unfortunately, is
allowed only two: Love it or fund it. We must accept the arrogant defiance of
the Israeli statesman bluntly telling us to stay out of his country’s internal
affairs as he strolls up to Capitol Hill to pocket billions of our tax dollars.
Above all, we must never suggest that Palestinians have as much right to their
own independent state as the Israelis do, lest we be portrayed as modern-day
Kristallnacht enablers.
Personally, I have never
considered the phrase 'God gave this to us' an acceptable policy position, as
though some Ancient Omnipotent Landlord mistakenly drew up a lease agreement
with a 3,000-year sublet option.
Yes, the Palestinians
refused to compromise in 1947, but if the Lenape showed up today with a
300-year-old claim to the Delaware Valley, I doubt we’d be packing up and
partitioning.
Yes, there have been Jews
on the land for millennia, but there have also been Palestinians. And before
either, there were Canaanites and Philistines amid the milk and honey. The Jews
dealt with these peoples the old-fashioned way: They smote some, co-opted
others, and constantly made bloody war among themselves. In fact (on the
off-chance that facts matter to the discussion), the entire period of a
“Greater Israel,” the basis for the current settlement controversy, lasted
no more than 80 years and ended around 920 B.C.
Some Jewish groups are
properly unceasing in their efforts to teach the world the lessons of the
Holocaust. But when a country institutes a policy of preemptive assassination,
it may be about time to ask what lessons Israel has learned, and from which side
it learned them.
While Israeli government
rationales have never been strangers to hypocrisy, shouldn’t someone at least
mention that if the British had pursued a strategy of assassinating militants
deemed to be threats to security, Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir would have
been killed in the 1940s and Count Folke Bernadotte, the man appointed U.N.
mediator in Palestine in 1948 (and promptly assassinated), would have spent the
1950s in a suite at the King David Hotel?
So Yasir Arafat is a
terrorist - but should Israelis then feel superior because their current prime
minister is merely a war criminal? Granted, Arafat must exert greater control
over his murderers - but couldn’t Sharon have trundled down from his perch
above Sabra and Shatilla to stop Christian Phalangists from bashing the heads of
Palestinian children against stone walls? OK, Yasir Arafat is a corrupt fraud -
but should the United States really be in the business of denying a people their
rights based on the inadequacies of their leader?
Please spare me the
hackneyed analogies about how Americans would feel if subjected to terrorist
bombings from Canada. Last time I checked, we weren’t surrounding Montreal
with troops. We weren’t diverting the water supply of Edmonton, bulldozing
homes on the outskirts of Toronto, or erecting roadblocks and checkpoints
throughout Quebec.
Perhaps there can never be
peace in the Middle East as long as Arafat is alive. But there will also never
be peace until the Holocaust is seen for what it was: a rancid and unspeakably
obscene chapter in a 20th-century book of depravity that includes Armenians,
Cambodians, Rwandans and Kulaks - and not an Accountability E-ZPass for a
government to view its policies as somehow beyond criticism. Meanwhile, the
United States continues to deplore all violence while pursuing policies that
indulge the lunacy of the settlers and fuel the lunacy of Hamas. Our government
can never be an honest broker of Arab hopes until it finds the political courage
to cease being a willing executor of Israeli demands.
These are the only absolute
truths about the Middle East: Barbarity and goodness exist on both sides while
innocent children are dying.
JerryBeggar@aol.com,
Philadelphia Inquirer Aug 17, 2001, (c) Philadelphia Inquirer
![]()
The
following is the text for a full-page ad to appear in the New York Times.
Jewish Voices Against the Occupation is soliciting signatures nationwide for
this ad.
JEWISH
VOICES AGAINST ISRAEL’S OCCUPATION OF PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES
We believe that there can
be peace between Israelis and Palestinians, a truly just resolution to their
conflict. But there can be no peace or security for Israelis or Palestinians
until Israel completely evacuates its settlements in Palestinian territories,
ends its military occupation, and returns to its pre-1967 borders.
We are outraged and
saddened by Israel’s brutal occupation of Palestinian lands and its
suppression of Palestinians’ right to sovereign statehood, guaranteed under
Articles 1 and 55 of the Charter of the United Nations. These lands, the West
Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem, were taken by force of arms in 1967, and
have been held ever since in violation of international law and numerous U.N.
Security Council and General Assembly resolutions.
In taking the above
positions, we support many in the Israeli peace movement, including Bat Shalom,
Coalition of Women for a Just Peace, Committee Against House Demolitions, Gush
Shalom, New Profile, Physicians for Human Rights, Rabbis for Human Rights, and
Ta’ayush.
As Jews, we call upon the
Israeli government to take the following steps:
Israel must agree to the
immediate establishment of an international peacekeeping force in the occupied
territories to protect civilians from violence by the Israeli military and
settlers. In particular, the following actions violate the Fourth Geneva
Convention:
Collective punishment
of civilians: Israel has demolished homes, applied debilitating closures to
parts or the whole of the territories, destroyed crops, agricultural land
and wells, and obstructed access to water and to medical care;
Use of excessive
military force against civilians: Israel has employed tanks, F-16s,
helicopter gunships, missiles, as well as rubber-coated metal bullets and
live ammunition;
Assassinations of
Palestinian leaders and activists;
[On October 19, 2000, the United Nations Human Rights Commission adopted a
resolution condemning Israel s “disproportionate and indiscriminate use of
force” against Palestinian civilians, and accused Israel of war crimes and
crimes against humanity.]
Israel must immediately
stop building or expanding settlements as a first step toward their complete
evacuation.
Israel receives
approximately $3 billion each year in U.S. aid. According to the U.S. Arms
Export Control Act, the military portion can be used only for “legitimate
self-defense” and “internal security.” In addition, the Leahy law
prohibits U.S. assistance to foreign military units that violate human rights.
Israel’s use of U.S. military aid to purchase U.S.-made weapons such as
helicopter gunships and fighter jets, with which it has attacked civilian
populations, clearly violates U.S. law.
Therefore, as Jews and U.S.
taxpayers, we call upon the U.S. Government to:
suspend military aid to
Israel until it withdraws completely from occupied territories, and
reduce economic aid by
the amount Israel spends on maintaining the settlements until all the
settlements are evacuated. These funds should be used to reconstruct the
devastated infrastructure of Palestine.
Finally, we urge the
Israeli Government to acknowledge that it bears significant historical
responsibility for the dispossession of the Palestinian people, and to join in
the effort to find a just solution to the plight of Palestinian refugees.
We also call upon the
Palestinian Authority to make every effort to curtail acts of terrorism against
Israeli civilians.
Israel’s security
policies harm all the peoples of the Middle East and make Israel less safe, not
more.
THE SETTLEMENTS MUST
GO.
THE OCCUPATION MUST
END.
THERE CAN BE NO PEACE
WITHOUT JUSTICE.
From September 29, 2000
(beginning of the second Intifada) until July 5, 2001
560 Palestinians
killed, 174 of them children
At least 16,000
Palestinians injured; 1,500 of them permanently disabled • 130 Israelis
killed, 25 of them children
472 Israelis injured
269 Palestinian homes
destroyed
About 80,000 olive and
other fruit trees uprooted
2,260 acres of
agricultural land bulldozed, rendered unusable
Why No Palestinian Could
Accept Barak’s “Generous Offers”
Barak reportedly
offered the Palestinians 90% of the Occupied Territories. But with the West
Bank “settlement blocs” (10%) and land in the Jerusalem area that Israel
would “annex,” together with a “security zone” stretching along the
Jordan River and southward, over 25% of Palestinian land would remain under
Israeli control. (Remember that the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East
Jerusalem comprise only 22% of pre-1948 Palestine.)
Israel would also
supervise all border crossings in and out of Palestine, control its air
space and main water supply, and indefinitely retain military and civil
control of the “security zone.”
No viable state could
result from this offer: Israeli “settlement blocs” would incorporate
Palestinian villages with about 90,000 inhabitants and much of the West Bank
s fertile land. These “blocs” would cut the Palestinian state into three
separate segments connected only by narrow strips of land.
Barak’s offer
addressed neither the question of the 61 Israeli settlements located within
the future Palestine nor the issue of Israeli control over the 300 miles of
bypass roads built throughout the Occupied Territories.
Barak reportedly
offered Palestinians sovereignty over some outlying Jerusalem suburbs and
administrative control over other neighborhoods near the city center, but no
details were supplied. Israel would exercise sovereignty over Haram Al-Sharif,
Islam’s third holiest site.
Palestinian refugees
would renounce the right to return from exile (except to the Palestinian
state) or to be compensated for their losses and suffering.
At the Taba talks in
January 2001, Barak made more generous offers, but political developments in
Israel made it impossible to proceed with these proposals.
(End of ad text)
Since this ad will be paid
for by the signatories, we are asking a minimum contribution of $36 per signer,
but urge you to contribute as much as you can. While this ad represents Jewish
voices, we welcome contributions from others who support this project.
All monies received beyond
the cost of the ad will be used to publish a similar ad in Israeli and other
U.S. newspapers.
You may sign this ad at http://www.jvao.org/
, but you should send your contribution by check to: Jewish Voices Against the
Occupation, P.O. Box 11606, Berkeley, CA 94712.
![]()
Activists
condemn US policy on Iraq: fast continues
Grassroots activists in the
National Network to End the War Against Iraq are condemning the most recent U.S.
bombings of Iraq and encouraging people to support efforts to lift the deadly
sanctions on Iraq. U.S. officials say the Aug. 10 attack by 50 American and
British aircraft on Iraqi military sites was part of the maintenance of the
“no-fly zones” in Iraq, implying the strikes were defensive. But the no-fly
zones have not been authorized by any U.N. Security Council resolution, and the
U.S./U.K. military action is blatantly illegal. U.S. references to “coalition
forces” are meant to obscure the fact that except for the British, the United
States has no support for these actions.
Activists in the Network
— along with most governments around the world and scores of human-rights
groups — argue that the real threat in Iraq is the continuation of sanctions
that have been imposed for 11 years. U.N. studies indicate more than 1 million
Iraqi civilians have died as a direct result of the sanctions. Most of the
nations of the world want the embargo lifted so that the Iraqi economy can be
rebuilt, but the United States has used its power to keep them in place.
While the United States
continues to pursue aggressive and illegal actions against Iraq, members of the
U.S. peace group Voices in the Wilderness continue their fast to bring attention
to the humanitarian crisis in Iraq. The “Breaking Ranks: A Fast to End the
Siege of Iraq” action across the street from the U.N. building in New York
began Aug. 6 and will continue through Sept. 14.
In early September, Voices
members and local activists across the United States will organize “Life Under
Siege” tent encampments to depict living conditions forced upon Iraqis by the
sanctions. For information, go to http://www.nonviolence.org/vitw/pages/145.htm.
The National Network to End the War Against Iraq was formed after a national
conference in Denver that brought together activists from peace-and-justice,
faith-based and student groups working to end the U.S. military and economic
attack on Iraq. For information, visit www.endthewar.org.
![]()
Breaking
ranks: a fast to end the siege against Iraq
from
Voices in the Wilderness Fast Group
On Day 10 of the fast,
(Wednesday, August 15), nine participants along with three supporters were
arrested for bringing a meal of cooked lentils and rice to the steps of the US
Mission to the UN. We invited staff members to share the meal and engage in
dialogue about how sanctions affect Iraqi civilians. The NYPD jailed us for 8 -
10 hours of “processing.” On September 20 we’ll be tried for criminal
trespass and obstruction. The head of security for the US Mission to the UN
stated several times that we have no right to be on the steps of the US Mission
because we have no official business to conduct inside. Rev. Daniel Berrigan, SJ
clarified that we have very important business to conduct, that we had come to
talk about the death of 5,000 children under age five who, according to UNICEF,
die each month as a direct result of the economic sanctions against Iraq.
Those arrested included
Rev. Dan Berrigan, SJ New York, NY, Rev. Simon Harak, SJ New York, NY, and Dr.
Earl Crow, Winston-Salem NC. Others also arrested are Cynthia Banas, Ceylon
Mooney, Melissa Muro, Kathy Kelly, Mark Paye, Lori Blanding, Johannes Limberger,
Rev. Jerry Zawada, OFM, and Joan Gregory.
Our August 13, 2001 letter
of invitation to the US Mission to the UN, said: “We again invite you to
partake with us in a simple meal of cooked lentils and rice, symbolic of daily
fare available to many Iraqi civilians as a consequence of economic sanctions.
We will also have with us untreated water from the East River. We don’t want
to serve or drink it, but rather remind ourselves of how vulnerable Iraqi
civilians are to water borne diseases. Many of us have traveled to Iraq and,
like you, we have tried to keep ourselves apprised of developments as they
affect ordinary Iraqi people. We have followed the proposals of the UK and the
US as regards smart sanctions very carefully, yet the UK proposal in its final
form still did not convince us that the so called smart sanctions would
alleviate the suffering endured by innocent Iraqi civilians. We look forward to
an opportunity to talk with any members of your staff who are willing to gather
with us.”
In a press statement, the
fasters noted that Condaleeza Rice assured the world that the US has Iraq on its
radar screen.
Our response to her
statement: “We’d like to see the vulnerable Iraqis, particularly children,
who continue to suffer under sanctions and bombardment, appear on the screen.”
In 1999, UNICEF estimated
that the sanctions had already cost the lives of 500,000 Iraqi children under
the age of five.
We were pleased to
celebrate, in jail, two anniversaries: Dan Berrigan professed his vows as a
Jesuit priest 62 years ago and Jerry Zawada took vows as a Franciscan priest 42
years ago.
ACTION:
Visit our website, http://www.nonviolence.org/vitw,
for updates, photos, reflections from our delegation just returned from Iraq and
descriptions of “life under siege” encampments planned for September 1 - 14.
Voices in the Wilderness, 1-773-784-8065, 1460 West Carmen Ave, Chicago 60640.
![]()